|
If you really want to learn the best way to play video poker or want to hone your skills, this is a good book. It tells the story of Bob Dancer (a video poker expert) who set out to win a million dollars playing video poker; it also lets you in on how to properly play video poker, there's quite a bit of learning to do if you want to play the game perfectly.Both Bob Dancer and Jean Scott are both considered to be expert of Video Poker and they are two completely different people, I'd recommend looking up both of them. Bob is more brash, and Jean is more easy going and happy, however this is just my opinion.
This book will be very interesting to anyone who is interested in conning the casinos, cheating, and then finding religion after winning at gambling. The book offers nothing in the way of video poker technique. You would do just as well spending the $20.00 on one hand of black jack.
$80,000 is four royals. Still, I would want to estimate the total value to me of such amenities and incorporate that into a mathematical risk of ruin calculation.As he has done so often in the past, Bob goes out of his way to criticize others' work, and the facts be damned. is currently the best book on how to play video poker on the market." Thanks for the compliment, Bob. Therefore, I'll simply point out that several respected analysts have shown that a penalty-card-free strategy comes much closer than 0.01% off of perfect play, and even my easy-to-follow Precision Play rules come within 0.01% of the game EV. I had no idea that a loss of this magnitude was possible." A quick run with the Sorokin formula reveals a 39.5% probability of losing an $80,000 bankroll on that game.
A few pages later he says, ".I learned that one pro had lost $80,000 on the [$5 15/10] Loose Deuces play at the Frontier. For example, for a game with a $1000 royal, he is happy with a $3000 to $5000 bankroll. And it's getting even harder as the casinos learn to structure promotions to be less vulnerable to pros.On page 210 Bob says that Deuces Wild is much more fun than Jacks or Better. I could go into a mathematical analysis discussing how infrequent such a decision occurs, and how frequently there is a penalty card, thus making the K-J the best play in the vast majority of cases, but Bob would come back with dozens of other trivial situations. One sentence on page 170 is especially revealing: "I'd had a lot of people work with me, get mad at me, and want nothing more to do with me." He seems to delight in being disliked.There are many good recommendations, such as learning a game thoroughly before playing it and continuing to practice on a trainer program so that your skills don't deteriorate. He uses the "3-to-5 royals rule" instead.
The really amazing thing is that anyone would be so candid about his personal life and the things he's done, and how he rationalizes doing things that many people might consider unethical, immoral or perhaps even illegal. That may be important for the 50 or so truly professional players (Bob's estimate), but the rest of us would probably lose more expected gain through playing errors and reduced playing speed when trying to follow perfect strategy.In spite of Bob's insistence upon perfection in playing strategy, he says he never uses a mathematical risk of ruin calculation. The difference is small on a royal flush (but still large if you view small errors as Bob does), but on a pair of jacks there's a 100% difference between 1-for-1 (returning your bet, which is just a push) and 1-to-1 (a real win of an amount equal to your bet, as on a winning craps pass bet).In summary, Million Dollar Video Poker is a very important book for anyone considering doing business with Bob, as it gives great insight into his ethics and morals. Jazbo Burns confirmed that, using his proprietary strategy analysis software.It's a minor point, but many places in the book Bob refers to a payoff as, for example, 800 to 1.
On Deuces Wild that figures to a modest 7.4% to 21% risk of ruin, but on Double Bonus Poker (one of Bob's favorite games), it's 61% to 74%. If you buy the book, do it for this section.The goal of making big money playing video poker boils down to a lot of hard work that would likely have yielded even greater rewards in a productive endeavor. That's less than one dollar (a cheap cup of coffee) on $10,000 action, not just on the example type of hand, but the total for all penalty card situations. Jokers Wild is an extremely difficult game to play. Consider a Jacks or Better hand containing a suited J-10, an off-suit King, and two low cards, one of which may or may not be a flush penalty card. Don't hold a suited 10 with an ace if the jackpot is less than 940-for-1, and don't hold a 10 with any honor if any discard is the same suit or a straight card." Nothing at all is said of two unsuited high cards in this note, but in the hand rank table to which it refers, "Two honors (unsuited)" is just above "K-10, Q-10, J-10 suited." How does Bob interpret this to say that a suited high card-10 should be held over two unsuited high cards. This is not a book on playing strategy.
Perhaps the most important lesson is that Bob spent several years learning how to take advantage of every potential opportunity, during which he made far less than he could have earned in a regular job in spite of admittedly stealing from the casinos (page 88). Bob's "estimate" was off by more than an order of magnitude.On page 175 Bob says, "Today, Dan Paymar's Video Poker Optimum Play. Moreover, his error was pointed out to him when he wrote the same thing several years ago.On page 125 he says, ". Paymar's [strategy] was probably the best and I estimate it generated a return that was still at least.25% less than perfect." Actually, unless you're trying to be as perfect as Bob, Joker Wild is much easier to learn than Double Bonus, and an independent expert has determined that my hand rank table comes within 0.02% of perfect. The footnote in question can be none other than note "m" on page 57.
Slot club rebates, comps and promotions add a lot to the expected value, with a corresponding reduction in risk of ruin. Most serious players would feel that he is often playing way over his bankroll. I especially liked the section titled "The care and feeding of slot hosts." Flattery and gifts (bribes) will get you over a lot of hurdles.On the very first page of the text, Bob shows his disdain for less than perfect players. Quoting verbatim from that edition, "`Honor-10 suited' means A-10, K-10, Q-10 or J-10 of the same suit. Many of his tactics are described in great detail. In a footnote in one of Paymar's appendices, he'd written that you should hold a suited high card-10 over two unsuited high cards unless there was another card suited with the high card-10."That's apparently his best example that my strategy is "full of mistakes," but the error is entirely his. Wow.
His Jacks or Better strategy was an eye opener. I'm surprised that Anthony Curtis didn't edit this to the mathematically correct 800-for-1 (the "1" is not returned with the payoff). It's more an autobiographical account of how the author extracted over a million dollars from the casinos. It's too bad you were unable to resist the temptation to say that it's full of errors. You wrote a long harangue (your word) on those "errors" several years ago, and I showed that altogether they added up to less than 0.01% of the total game EV. Still, it gave me added insight. But don't despair; you can still have fun playing video poker as a skilled recreational player and supplement your income without all that work if you start with the strategy book that Bob recommends. It was considerably more complex than Wong's, but, as I learned as I went along, full of mistakes.
The "best" play when there is no penalty card is the J-10 (highest EV by 0.01). If you are not up to the task, the book will hopefully dissuade you from the attempt.By far the most valuable part of the book is the final chapter, "Winning is a Process, Not an Event." These four pages give the best advice I've ever read for a wannabe professional gambler. So much for the "3-to-5 royals rule." I might risk a few hundred dollars with a 40% risk of ruin, but not $80,000.To be fair, however, we must acknowledge that Bob doesn't play where his advantage is only about 0.1% on the game itself. On page 41, he says, "I'd picked up Dan Paymar's 8th edition of Video Poker Precision Play. It is also important for anyone intent on becoming a professional gambler, no matter whether your game of choice is video poker, blackjack or anything else. I consider it very significant that this is the only time in the book where he says anything about video poker being fun.
Thought this was a how to book to playing video poker. Instead it was the author bragging about how good he was at the game. Boring.
I've played video poker using his strategies and I lose every time. Even though he won over $1 million in a five-month period, he had to put most of his winnings back into the machines in order to win the next big jackpot. Mathematically his strategies are probably perfect, but that doesn't put money into my pocket. I guess if I had a bankroll of $80,000 to spend I would eventually win a jackpot, but then what's the sense if I win a jackpot of $40,000 when I'm already down by $60,000. The book is a nice story about his life while earning a living at video poker, but his real earnings these days are from the sale of books, strategy cards, and video poker CDs.
|
